| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Longitudinal Study of the Uptake of |
| Internal Parks | External Parks | IT | ||||||
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 2000 | 1995 | 1997 | 2000 | 2000 |
Never | 46.43 | 22.60 | 16.00 | 14.52 | 3.77 | 46.03 | 32.35 | 4.76 | 3.03 |
Seldom | 3.57 | 15.07 | 18.00 | 17.74 | 1.89 | 4.76 | 14.71 | 2.38 | 3.03 |
once in a while | 10.71 | 20.55 | 21.00 | 24.19 | 16.98 | 4.76 | 13.24 | 23.81 | — |
Often | — | 10.96 | 8.00 | 22.58 | 18.87 | — | 8.82 | 9.52 | 3.03 |
Regularly | — | 7.53 | 12.00 | 11.29 | 39.62 | 1.59 | 4.41 | 23.81 | 12.12 |
Daily | — | 1.37 | 3.00 | 4.84 | 9.43 | — | 4.41 | 26.19 | 78.79 |
no answer | 39.29 | 21.92 | 22.00 | 4.84 | 9.43 | 42.86 | 22.06 | 9.52 | — |
N | 56 | 146 | 98 | 62 | 53 | 62 | 66 | 41 | 33 |
Figure 1 shows the significant uptake in the usage of World-wide web browsers since 1995. Interesting, this figure also illustrates a levelling out in the use of the WWW since 1997 although the overall usage level of the WWW still remains extremely high.
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 2000 | |||||
| Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male |
Never | 59.26 | 34.48 | 29.41 | 17.11 | 13.21 | 20.00 | 17.65 | 10.71 | — | 8.33 |
Seldom | — | 6.90 | 14.71 | 15.79 | 20.75 | 15.56 | 20.59 | 14.29 | 3.45 | — |
once in a while | 11.11 | 10.34 | 19.12 | 22.37 | 20.75 | 20.00 | 20.59 | 28.57 | 17.24 | 16.67 |
Often | — | — | 8.82 | 13.16 | 11.32 | 4.44 | 20.59 | 25.00 | 24.14 | 12.50 |
Regularly | — | — | 7.35 | 7.89 | 13.21 | 11.11 | 17.65 | 3.57 | 37.93 | 41.67 |
Daily | — | — | 2.94 | — | — | 4.44 | — | 10.71 | 6.90 | 12.50 |
no answer | 29.63 | 48.28 | 17.65 | 23.68 | 20.75 | 24.44 | 2.94 | 7.14 | 10.34 | 8.33 |
N | 27 | 29 | 68 | 76 | 52 | 44 | 34 | 28 | 29 | 24 |
In terms of gender it is not possible to differentiate any trends in the usage of WWW browsers by the internal student population (table 2). On the whole, male students claim to be slightly more regular users—but this may well be the result of a male confidence bias inherent in the self-reporting method used in the survey. Among the external students (table 3), women tended to be less frequent users in the past, but this trend appears to have reversed in 2000. This result contradicts the more general finding of Mitra et al (2000) that men ‘tended to use computers more than women’.
An assessment of the upbringing of the student (metropolitan, non-metropolitan city, rural) showed differences in all samples, but did not reveal any diachronic patterns.
| 1995 | 1997 | 2000 | |||
| Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male |
Never | 58.82 | 40.00 | 35.29 | 31.25 | 4.17 | 5.88 |
Seldom | 5.88 | 4.44 | 17.65 | 12.50 | — | 5.88 |
once in a while | — | 6.67 | 23.53 | — | 20.83 | 23.53 |
Often | — | — | 14.71 | 3.13 | 8.33 | 11.76 |
Regularly | — | 2.22 | 2.94 | 6.25 | 25.00 | 23.53 |
Daily | — | — | — | 9.38 | 29.17 | 23.53 |
no answer | 35.29 | 46.67 | 5.88 | 37.5 | 12.50 | 5.88 |
N | 17 | 44 | 33 | 31 | 23 | 17 |
A comparison of the usage of WWW browsers between IT and Parks students in 2000 illustrates a significant difference between the two cohorts (table 1). IT students are more regular users of the WWW with nearly 80% of students using it on a daily basis compared to less than 10% with external Parks students. This result is not surprising as IT students at CSU are required to access a majority of their course resources using a WWW browser. Even though it is expected that this differentiation between Parks and IT students will continue in the future; extrapolation of the expected usage by Parks students suggest that this gap will decrease over the next few years.
The level of computer use is one measure of technological change and acceptance. However the extent of computer use does not fully reflect a student's ability to deal with the technology and the associated applications. An alternate approach is to investigate respondents' confidence when using such applications.
To measure their level of confidence, respondents’ were asked to self rate themselves as to the type of user of computer technology they are. Respondents were given the option to select one of the following nine answer options: ‘power user,’ ‘very confident,’ ‘confident,’ ‘comfortable,’ ‘uncomfortable,’ ‘a bit daunted,’ ‘very uneasy,’ ‘near panic,’ and ‘not yet used.’ This approach might create a bias in the gender-specific responses, as males may be more assertive and positive in their responses than women; however the approach detailed is believed to be a good surrogate measure of their actual state of anxiety/confidence.
Statistical analysis (t-test) was carried out to compare between each of the annual averages for the internal and external populations respectively, as well as for the averages for 1995, 1997 and 2000 comparing the internal with the external populations. The average response (coded as 0 for ‘not yet used’ and 8 for ‘power user’) was calculated for each and plotted with their standard deviations as graphs to show the diachronic development of computer confidence.
| Internal Parks | External Parks | IT | ||||||
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 2000 | 1995 | 1997 | 2000 | 2000 |
Not yet | 39.29 | 17.12 | 11.00 | 9.68 | 3.77 | 47.62 | 25.00 | 2.38 | — |
Near panic | — | 2.74 | 1.00 | — | — | 1.59 | 1.47 | — | — |
Very Uneasy | 1.79 | 1.37 | 2.00 | 4.84 | 3.77 | 1.59 | 4.41 | — | — |
A bit daunted | 8.93 | 11.64 | 13.00 | 11.29 | 1.89 | 3.17 | 13.24 | 4.76 | — |
Uncomfortable | 8.93 | 7.53 | 9.00 | 8.06 | 7.55 | 1.59 | 7.35 | 2.38 | — |
Comfortable | 3.57 | 25.34 | 27.00 | 27.42 | 11.32 | 4.76 | 10.29 | 26.19 | — |
Confident | — | 11.64 | 16.00 | 24.19 | 28.3 | 3.17 | 4.41 | 19.05 | 9.09 |
Very confident | — | 6.85 | 7.00 | 8.06 | 26.42 | — | 8.82 | 35.71 | 21.21 |
Power User | — | 1.37 | 3.00 | — | 9.43 | — | 1.47 | 2.38 | 69.70 |
no answer | 37.50 | 14.38 | 11.00 | 6.45 | 7.55 | 36.51 | 23.53 | 7.14 | — |
N | 56 | 146 | 98 | 62 | 53 | 62 | 66 | 41 | 33 |
Table 4 illustrates that over time both internal and external students became more confident in the use of WWW browsers (table 4). The average level of confidence of the internal students in using World Wide Web browsers has shown a steady increase between 1995, when the average student was very uneasy, and 2000, when the average student felt confident (figure 2).
The curve had its steepest increase between 1995 and 1996, then plateaued out temporarily but increased again after 1998. The external student population also saw a steady increase between 1995 and 2000, although the linearity of that curve may be partially brought about by the fact that only three sampling points exist. The level in confidence observed for each year among the internal population increased significantly compared that of the previous year (ranges from P=0.05 to P<0.001). The same applies to the distance education body of the population (Spennemann & Atkinson 2002a).
As with many other applications assessed (Spennemann & Atkinson 2002a), more men than women claim to be confident in the use of the programs. This is more pronounced among the internal population (tables 5 and 6).
| 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 2000 | |||||
| Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male |
Not yet | 48.15 | 27.59 | 20.59 | 14.47 | 16.98 | 4.44 | 11.76 | 7.14 | — | 8.33 |
Near panic | — | — | 2.94 | 2.63 | 1.89 | — | — | — | — | — |
Very Uneasy | — | 3.45 | 2.94 | — | 3.77 | — | 2.94 | 7.14 | 3.45 | 4.17 |
A bit daunted | 14.81 | 3.45 | 8.82 | 13.16 | 11.32 | 15.56 | 14.71 | 7.14 | — | 4.17 |
Uncomfortable | 7.41 | 10.34 | 11.76 | 3.95 | 11.32 | 6.67 | 8.82 | 7.14 | 6.90 | 8.33 |
Comfortable | — | 6.90 | 19.12 | 31.58 | 33.96 | 17.78 | 29.41 | 25.00 | 13.79 | 8.33 |
Confident | — | — | 11.76 | 11.84 | 7.55 | 24.44 | 23.53 | 25.00 | 37.93 | 16.67 |
Very confident | — | — | 5.88 | 7.89 | 7.55 | 6.67 | 2.94 | 14.29 | 20.69 | 33.33 |
Power User | — | — | 1.47 | 1.32 | — | 6.67 | — | — | 6.90 | 12.50 |
no answer | 29.63 | 41.38 | 14.71 | 13.16 | 5.66 | 17.78 | 5.88 | 7.14 | 10.34 | 4.17 |
N | 27 | 29 | 68 | 76 | 52 | 44 | 34 | 28 | 29 | 24 |
| 1995 | 1997 | 2000 |
| |||
| Fem | Male | Fem | Male | Fem | Male | |
Not yet | 58.82 | 37.78 | 17.65 | 34.38 | — | 5.88 | |
Near panic | — | 2.22 | — | 3.13 | — | — | |
Very Uneasy | — | 2.22 | 8.82 | — | — | — | |
A bit daunted | — | 4.44 | 17.65 | 9.38 | 4.17 | 5.88 | |
Uncomfortable | — | 2.22 | 14.71 | — | — | — | |
Comfortable | — | 4.44 | 17.65 | 3.13 | 25.00 | 29.41 | |
Confident | — | 4.44 | 5.88 | 3.13 | 25.00 | 11.76 | |
Very confident | — | — | 5.88 | 9.38 | 33.33 | 41.18 | |
Power User | — | — | — | 3.13 | 4.17 | — | |
no answer | 29.41 | 37.78 | 11.76 | 34.38 | 8.33 | 5.88 | |
N | 17 | 44 | 33 | 31 | 23 | 17 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A regional break down of the internal students (table 7) shows that the confidence level of WWW use among rural students seems to marginally lag behind that of the metropolitan and non-metropolitan students. The same finding was indicated for e-mail usage (Spennemann & Atkinson 2002b).
The average responses between the Parks Management and the Information Technology Students (for the year 2000) were statistically very significantly different (P≤0.0001 !) (see table 4 for responses). The reason for this difference rests in the fact that many of the subjects IT students undertake are only available using a WWW browser. This requires IT students to be very proficient with using such applications.
This longitudinal study has shown that the level of usage of WWW browser software applications has increased from 1995 to 2000 among all students outperforming more traditional applications such as word processing and spreadsheets (Spennemann and Atkinson 2002a). This conforms to the overall expectations and trend in the growth of the WWW (Haynal 2000). Jackson et al. (2001) showed that male students were more frequent and more confident users of WWW browsers than females, whereas the roles were reversed in the use of e-mail programs. Our longitudinal study supports this observation for the use of e-mail programs (Spennemann and Atkinson 2002a), as well as for the use of WWW browsers in the internal cohort investigated. Among the external students, however, the gender trend seems to be changing, as more mature-aged women make use of WWW browsers and increasingly gain confidence in their use.
An examination of the WWW browser as well as of other applications (word processing, spreadsheet etc) shows a correlation between the frequency of use and the level of confidence with which they are being used (Spennemann & Atkinson 2002a). A comparison of the environmental student population with that of the IT cohort shows that IT students are much more regular users of the WWW. This can be directly related to the requirement to use a WWW browser as the means of accessing the majority of teaching and learning materials. Likewise, the confidence in using the software is greater among IT students. This suggests that forced use of WWW browsers leads to more regular use of such browsers, which results in greater confidence among the users.
It can be posited that this in turn may increase the use of the applications for non-teaching/learning related aspects.
Atkinson, John S., Green, David G. & Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1997). Delivering on-line education via the World Wide Web: the Charles Sturt University experience in: Michael Wyatt (ed.), Information on-line and on disk ‘97. Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Information Online and on Disc Conference (pp. 213-230). Sydney: Information Science Section, Australian Library and Information Association.
Atkinson, John and Spennemann, Dirk H.R (2002). Longitudinal study of male and female student attitudes to computing. ASCILITE in press
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research 18 (1), 63-78.
Clegg, S. (2001). Theorising the machine: gender, education and computing. Gender & Education. 13(3), 307-324.
Flowers, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Pierson, C. T. (2000). Information technology use and cognitive outcomes in the first year of college. Journal of Higher Education, 71(6), 637-667.
Haynal, R (2000). Internet Growth Charts [Online]. Available: http://navigators.com/stats.html [Accessed on 14 Aug 2002]
Honey M., Culp KM. and Carrigg F. (2000). Perspectives on technology and education research: Lessons from the past and present. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 23(1), 5-14.
Jackson LA. Ervin KS. Gardner PD. Schmitt N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles. 44(5-6), 363-379.
Lim, Kieran F and Kendle, Amanda (2001). IT skills of university first year undergraduate students: two 2001 matriculation cohorts. UniServe Scince News 18, October 2001. Available: http://science.uniserve.edu.au/newsletter/vol18/lim.html
Lim, Kieran F. and Lee, Jeanne (2000). IT Skills of university undergraduate students enrolled in a first year unit. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 16(3), 215-238.
Meredyth, D., Russell, N., Blackwood, L., Thomas, J. and Wise, P. (1999). Real Time: Computers, Change and Schooling. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Meredyth, D., Russell, N., Blackwood, L., Thomas, J. and Wise, P. (2000). Real time: Computers, change and schooling. Report for the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Brisbane, Australia: Griffith University.
Mitra, A., Lenzmeier, S., Steffensmeier, Avon, R, Qu, N and Hazen, M (2000). Gender and computer use in an academic institution: report from a longitudinal study. Journal of Education Computing Research. 23(1), 67-84.
Palmer, Stuart R. and Bray, Sharyn L. (2001). Longitudinal study of computer usage in flexible engineering education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 17(3), 313-329.
Rogers, P. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 22:4, 455-472.
Schott, G. and Selwyn, N. (2000). Examining the “male, antisocial” stereotype of high computer use. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 23(3), 291-303
Shuell, T. J. and Farber, S. L. (2001). Students perceptions of technology in college courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 24(2). 119-138.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1995). Skimming the bright surface, or sounding the murky depths? Teaching to learn and learning to teach Cultural Resource Management face-to-face and at a distance. in J.Parker & R.J.Meyenn (eds.) Charles Sturt University Tertiary Teaching Colloquium Papers 1994. Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1996a). Computers in Environmental Education. Assignment submission via electronic mail: problems & opportunities School of Environmental and Information Sciences Report Vol. 9. Charles Sturt University, School of Environmental and Information Sciences: Albury, NSW.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1996b). Gender imbalances in computer access among environmental science students. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology Vol. 1(2). Available: http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/spenne.htm
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1997a). Do techno-sceptics use on-campus e-mail? Campus-Wide Information Systems 14(2), 46-53.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1997c). Use of electronic mail among Park Management students at Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW: Open Learning Institute,Charles Sturt University. Occasional Papers in Open and Distance Learning. Charles Sturt University 21, 29-40.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. (1999). Welcome to the global classroom! Teaching in the 3rd millennium. Education at a Distance 13(1), 11-19.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R and Atkinson, John S. (2002a). Overcoming Technophobia? Computer use among Park Management students at Charles Sturt University: A longitudinal Study 1995-2000. Johnstone Centre Report Vol. 162. Albury, NSW: The Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Atkinson, John S. (2002b). A longitudinal study of Data Management Practices among Parks Management Students. Campus-Wide Information Systems in press 2002.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R. and Atkinson, John S. (in press). A longitudinal study of the uptake of and confidence in using e-mail among parks management students. Campus-Wide Information Systems.
Spennemann, Dirk H.R., Birckhead, Jim, Green, David G. & Atkinson, John S. (1996). The electronic colonisation of the Pacific. Computer Mediated Communications Magazine Vol. 3(2). Available: http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1996/feb/spen.html
Valentine G. & Holloway SL. (2001). A window on the wider world? Rural children's use of information and communication technologies. Journal of Rural Studies. 17(4), 383-394.
Dirk HR Spennemann (MA Frankfurt, Ph.D. Australian National University) is Associate Professor in Cultural Heritage Management at Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia. His main research interests are German colonial heritage in Oceania, in particular Micronesia, and historic preservation/ cultural heritage management issues in Micronesia. His second focus is threats to heritage posed by natural and human hazards and by managers in their efforts to counter these hazards. Ethical Heritage Planning and Policy are the cornerstones that need to be addressed if humanity's past is to have a meaningful future.
As a university educator, Dirk is interested in the implications of the utilization of information technology for students and staff. He serves on the editorial board of Campus-wide Information Systems. He is the author/editor of 22 books, with a life-time publication record of over 150 book chapters and refereed academic papers, over 60 non-refereed papers, and close to 100 technical reports and consultancy studies. He currently edits the Micronesian Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Tel: +61-2-6051 9947 Fax: +61-2-6051 9897
E-mail: dspennemann@csu.edu.au